[RED DEMOCRATICA] Comentarios : Oficiales de inmigracion no estan encima de la ley.

Apreciados co-miembros: Reciban mi respetuoso saludo y un cordial buenos dias. Deseo de que hayan pasado un hermoso fin de semana.  Los que estamos envueltos en la defensa del derecho de los inmigrantes y ademas, luchamos por los derechos civiles, en los Estados Unidos; debemos estar contentos con la decision del Juez Peter Sheridan de Newark, de negar que los oficiales de inmigracion tengan derecho a la inmunidad, y de negar ademas, que las quejas que hacen los inmigrantes, cuyas casas fueron invadidas por los oficiales de inmigracion, sean tratadas por la corte de inmigracion en vez de la corte de Newark. Este ejemplo, permitiria de que jueces locales traten los abusos que se cometen con nuestros hermanos y hermamas inmigrantes y no sean llevados a una corte de inmigracion, donde sus derechos y su libertad sean tratados con algunas limitaciones.  La decision del Juez Sheridan permitio de que los demandantes (inmigrantes) siguieran con su pelea acerca de que entrar a sus casas sin ningun orden legal es inconstitucional, este es un avanze muy importante y que otros jueces deberian tomar en cuenta, ya que se ha demostrado con esta decision de que los oficiales de inmigracion no esta por encima de la ley, como lo dijera el Professor Baher Azmy de el "Seton Hall Law School Center for Social Justice". A continuacion, el articulo escrito por Elizabeth Llorente. Gracias por leerlo. Humildemente, David Toledo, MA Secretario de Inmigracion PAPAC   Judge refuses to dismiss suit on immigrant raids Saturday, May 16, 2009 BY ELIZABETH LLORENTE NorthJersey. com STAFF WRITER A decision by a federal judge in Newark allows a lawsuit to proceed in which the plaintiffs argue that warrantless raids on immigrants' homes by federal agents are unconstitutional. In his written decision released this month, Judge Peter Sheridan denied a request for dismissal by immigration officials. He rejected several arguments by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, including: * That high-level officers of the Department of Homeland Security, which oversees ICE, were entitled to immunity. * That the raids involved immigration issues and therefore complaints about constitutional rights by the plaintiffs, who are immigrants, are the jurisdiction of Immigration Court, not U.S. District Court in Newark. Sheridan did concur with immigration officials' request that five of the 13 plaintiffs who were anonymous in the complaint should be either identified or dropped from the lawsuit, which was filed last year by the Seton Hall Law School Center for Social Justice and Roseland-based Lowenstein Sandler PC, on behalf of the immigrants. Lawyers for the plaintiffs, who include undocumented immigrants, legal immigrants and naturalized citizens, praised the 43-page decision. "This decision confirms that high-ranking government officials are not above the law even when called to account for actions against vulnerable immigrant populations, " said Professor Baher Azmy of the Seton Hall Law School Center for Social Justice. "We're eager to develop a connection between aggressive enforcement policies created by [a former DHS executive] and a system of wholesale constitutional violations that were happening on the ground all over the country," Azmy said. "We do not believe this is the work of a few bad apples but that is a result of policy decisions made at high levels of government." The plaintiffs' complaint contends that ICE has engaged in a pattern of pre-dawn raids at the homes of immigrants in which agents misrepresent themselves as local police to lull people into allowing them into their residences. The lawsuit, one of many around the country alleging that such raids often violate constitutional rights, said the practice arose from policies set by high-ranking DHS and ICE officials in Washington. ICE public affairs officer Harold Ort said: "ICE will not comment on pending litigation." E-mail: llorente@northjerse y.com

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (1) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Calendar

Red Democratica 10 years "On line" (1998-2008)!
Http://reddemocratica.blogspot.com
Http://www.caretas.com.pe/2000/1631/articulos/protesta.phtml
Http://www.caretas.com.pe/2000/1612/articulos/debate.phtml

Celebrando 10 anos "On Line"..2008

Keep the candle burning

I have a dream
http://www.stanford.edu/group/King/about_king/interactiveFrame.htm

FORUM TPSIPOL: RED DEMOCRATICA .
Informacion : Http://tpsipol.home-page.org

Http://groups.yahoo.com/group/eleccion

Para enviar un message , enviar a: eleccion@yahoogroups.com
Para suscribirse al Forum , enviar un mensaje a : eleccion-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Para salir del Forum, enviar un mensaje en blanco : eleccion-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

MARKETPLACE

$9000/Month at Home. Learn how Part Time, online!.

---

I Get Paid $450/day. Find out How. Part Time!.

---

Mom Power: Discover the community of moms doing more for their families, for the world and for each other

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

Recent Activity

Visit Your Group

Health Groups

for people over 40

Join people who are

staying in shape.

Check out the

Y! Groups blog

Stay up to speed

on all things Groups!

Yahoo! Groups

Weight Management Challenge

Join others who

are losing pounds.

.

__,_._,___